week4paug.net

Where's the stage? Spurious Generalities => Random Conversations => March Band Madness => Topic started by: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 11:52:52 AM

Poll
Question: If one round ends in a tie, should both advance to a three-way battle?
Option 1: Yes. Three-ways are good (so I've read on the internet.) votes: 3
Option 2: No. There should be a play-off. votes: 0
Option 3: Arbitrary decisions are ok with me. votes: 1
Option 4: Did someone say three way? votes: 12
Title: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 11:52:52 AM
Well?
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: Hicks on August 09, 2012, 11:59:25 AM
If people stopped voting wrong this wouldn't be an issue.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: runawayjimbo on August 09, 2012, 12:25:09 PM
Look, I understand your frustration. Bozeman got hosed. And I'm sorry I didn't specify in the original poll that it was just a placeholder and that people shouldn't vote on it until the other matchup was final. But this is a tournament, so you can't have a tie or a head-to-head-to-head (what is this, Canada?). I mean, I already introduced my own bias by leaving the poll open past the 10pm Tuesday deadline because it was close and I figured Hicks could pull another jedi mind trick out of his ass (I blame him, really). But I think the only fair thing to the 13 people who voted (inexplicably) for Mike's is to let that one play through. We'll get 'em next time.
 
Now about that three way...
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:30:17 PM
What about the 13 that voted for Tweezer?
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: Superfreakie on August 09, 2012, 12:40:43 PM
I <3 the 'paug


and threeways.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: Hicks on August 09, 2012, 12:49:41 PM
Yeah my bad, I wouldn't have thought my jedi powers would have been required for this matchup. 
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:55:03 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

If Bozeman was played in the Northeast, it'd have already shutout every other jam in this tournament.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:59:45 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:55:03 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

If Bozeman was played in the Northeast, it'd have already shutout every other jam in this tournament.

I guess we'll never know.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: mbw on August 09, 2012, 01:02:35 PM
(http://hypervocal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/normal_105here_for_the_gang_bang.jpg)
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: VDB on August 09, 2012, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

That woulda been an epic final though.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: phil on August 09, 2012, 03:17:31 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:55:03 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

If Bozeman was played in the Northeast, it'd have already shutout every other jam in this tournament.

This.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: gah on August 09, 2012, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: V00D00BR3W on August 09, 2012, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

That woulda been an epic final though.

This is true.

But what really chaps my ass is that there wasn't appropriate rules in place from the start of this said tournament if such an event were to arise. And now look what's happened? The entire Paug is in an uproar over this. I swear to God jimbo if this causes a rift in the Paug  universe and we go to civil war over it, it'll be your head.  :samurai:
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: McGrupp on August 09, 2012, 05:34:14 PM
Quote from: goodabouthood on August 09, 2012, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: V00D00BR3W on August 09, 2012, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

That woulda been an epic final though.

This is true.

But what really chaps my ass is that there wasn't appropriate rules in place from the start of this said tournament if such an event were to arise. And now look what's happened? The entire Paug is in an uproar over this. I swear to God jimbo if this causes a rift in the Paug  universe and we go to civil war over it, it'll be your head.  :samurai:

Ties? Ain't nobody got time for that!
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: runawayjimbo on August 09, 2012, 05:44:31 PM
Quote from: goodabouthood on August 09, 2012, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: V00D00BR3W on August 09, 2012, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

That woulda been an epic final though.

This is true.

But what really chaps my ass is that there wasn't appropriate rules in place from the start of this said tournament if such an event were to arise. And now look what's happened? The entire Paug is in an uproar over this. I swear to God jimbo if this causes a rift in the Paug  universe and we go to civil war over it, it'll be your head.  :samurai:

Maybe if somebody didn't bitch that they needed a couple extra days in the first place I coulda set a hard stop to voting and none of this would have mattered. Or maybe somebody who voted for Mike's shoulda changed their vote to the correct choice.

BTW, with all this noise from the disenfranchised Bozeman supporters I'm starting to wonder who the hell the 13 Mike's voters were (other than birdman, susep, and a certain husky panted gentleman).
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: McGrupp on August 09, 2012, 05:59:48 PM
Quote from: runawayjimbo on August 09, 2012, 05:44:31 PM
Quote from: goodabouthood on August 09, 2012, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: V00D00BR3W on August 09, 2012, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

That woulda been an epic final though.

This is true.

But what really chaps my ass is that there wasn't appropriate rules in place from the start of this said tournament if such an event were to arise. And now look what's happened? The entire Paug is in an uproar over this. I swear to God jimbo if this causes a rift in the Paug  universe and we go to civil war over it, it'll be your head.  :samurai:

Maybe if somebody didn't bitch that they needed a couple extra days in the first place I coulda set a hard stop to voting and none of this would have mattered. Or maybe somebody who voted for Mike's shoulda changed their vote to the correct choice.

BTW, with all this noise from the disenfranchised Bozeman supporters I'm starting to wonder who the hell the 13 Mike's voters were (other than birdman, susep, and a certain husky panted gentleman).

Wait, was that racist?
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: barnesy305 on August 09, 2012, 06:01:26 PM
The whole thing sickens me.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: gah on August 09, 2012, 06:06:30 PM
Quote from: McGrupp on August 09, 2012, 05:59:48 PM
Quote from: runawayjimbo on August 09, 2012, 05:44:31 PM
Quote from: goodabouthood on August 09, 2012, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: V00D00BR3W on August 09, 2012, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

That woulda been an epic final though.

This is true.

But what really chaps my ass is that there wasn't appropriate rules in place from the start of this said tournament if such an event were to arise. And now look what's happened? The entire Paug is in an uproar over this. I swear to God jimbo if this causes a rift in the Paug  universe and we go to civil war over it, it'll be your head.  :samurai:

Maybe if somebody didn't bitch that they needed a couple extra days in the first place I coulda set a hard stop to voting and none of this would have mattered. Or maybe somebody who voted for Mike's shoulda changed their vote to the correct choice.

BTW, with all this noise from the disenfranchised Bozeman supporters I'm starting to wonder who the hell the 13 Mike's voters were (other than birdman, susep, and a certain husky panted gentleman).

Wait, was that racist?

Pretty sure it was. Someone get Rj in here. And tell him to bring the ban hammer! It's on now motherfucker. You don't know who you're fucking with! Shit's about to get real son! DON"T TELL ME TO CALM DOWN! I AM CALM! YOU CRACKERS GONNA GET IT NOW!!!!!!!!!

Quote from: barnesy305 on August 09, 2012, 06:01:26 PM
The whole thing sickens me.

SICKENS YOU?!?! AIN'T NOBODY GOT TIME FOR THAT!!!!!!!
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: barnesy305 on August 09, 2012, 06:10:36 PM
Quote from: goodabouthood on August 09, 2012, 06:06:30 PM
Quote from: McGrupp on August 09, 2012, 05:59:48 PM
Quote from: runawayjimbo on August 09, 2012, 05:44:31 PM
Quote from: goodabouthood on August 09, 2012, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: V00D00BR3W on August 09, 2012, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

That woulda been an epic final though.

This is true.

But what really chaps my ass is that there wasn't appropriate rules in place from the start of this said tournament if such an event were to arise. And now look what's happened? The entire Paug is in an uproar over this. I swear to God jimbo if this causes a rift in the Paug  universe and we go to civil war over it, it'll be your head.  :samurai:

Maybe if somebody didn't bitch that they needed a couple extra days in the first place I coulda set a hard stop to voting and none of this would have mattered. Or maybe somebody who voted for Mike's shoulda changed their vote to the correct choice.

BTW, with all this noise from the disenfranchised Bozeman supporters I'm starting to wonder who the hell the 13 Mike's voters were (other than birdman, susep, and a certain husky panted gentleman).

Wait, was that racist?

Pretty sure it was. Someone get Rj in here. And tell him to bring the ban hammer! It's on now motherfucker. You don't know who you're fucking with! Shit's about to get real son! DON"T TELL ME TO CALM DOWN! I AM CALM! YOU CRACKERS GONNA GET IT NOW!!!!!!!!!

Quote from: barnesy305 on August 09, 2012, 06:01:26 PM
The whole thing sickens me.

SICKENS YOU?!?! AIN'T NOBODY GOT TIME FOR THAT!!!!!!!

I need a cold pop!!
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: McGrupp on August 09, 2012, 06:22:46 PM
Quote from: goodabouthood on August 09, 2012, 06:06:30 PM
Quote from: McGrupp on August 09, 2012, 05:59:48 PM
Quote from: runawayjimbo on August 09, 2012, 05:44:31 PM
Quote from: goodabouthood on August 09, 2012, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: V00D00BR3W on August 09, 2012, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
Quote from: danje on August 09, 2012, 12:38:33 PM
It's the god damned Bozeman Tweezer. It should have won the entire tournament by default.

Come, now. It's no Providence Bowie.

That woulda been an epic final though.

This is true.

But what really chaps my ass is that there wasn't appropriate rules in place from the start of this said tournament if such an event were to arise. And now look what's happened? The entire Paug is in an uproar over this. I swear to God jimbo if this causes a rift in the Paug  universe and we go to civil war over it, it'll be your head.  :samurai:

Maybe if somebody didn't bitch that they needed a couple extra days in the first place I coulda set a hard stop to voting and none of this would have mattered. Or maybe somebody who voted for Mike's shoulda changed their vote to the correct choice.

BTW, with all this noise from the disenfranchised Bozeman supporters I'm starting to wonder who the hell the 13 Mike's voters were (other than birdman, susep, and a certain husky panted gentleman).

Wait, was that racist?

Pretty sure it was. Someone get Rj in here. And tell him to bring the ban hammer! It's on now motherfucker. You don't know who you're fucking with! Shit's about to get real son! DON"T TELL ME TO CALM DOWN! I AM CALM! YOU CRACKERS GONNA GET IT NOW!!!!!!!!!

Quote from: barnesy305 on August 09, 2012, 06:01:26 PM
The whole thing sickens me.

SICKENS YOU?!?! AIN'T NOBODY GOT TIME FOR THAT!!!!!!!

hahahaha, oh man, looks like I was the racist one. I read that as "husky painted gentleman". Painted as in, your ... uh... skin ... color..... gonna exit now.

Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: barnesy305 on August 09, 2012, 06:26:19 PM
McGrupp's college education hard at work.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: McGrupp on August 09, 2012, 06:51:37 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNmWt9URJD4
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 06:52:42 PM
/me starts Occupy Paug movement
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 10:45:34 PM
Quote from: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 06:52:42 PM
/me starts Occupy Paug movement

I'm gonna sit the fuck down in this thread and I'm not leaving for any reason any time soon unless our demands are met. I will stay here through rain sleet, snow, postal strikes, and..

oh shit time to flip the record.

bbialb
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 10:54:12 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 10:45:34 PM
Quote from: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 06:52:42 PM
/me starts Occupy Paug movement

I'm gonna sit the fuck down in this thread and I'm not leaving for any reason any time soon unless our demands are met. I will stay here through rain sleet, snow, postal strikes, and..

oh shit time to flip the record.

bbialb

The people show up, and suddenly the job poll creators are nowhere to be found.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: mbw on August 09, 2012, 11:45:42 PM
Quote from: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 10:54:12 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 10:45:34 PM
Quote from: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 06:52:42 PM
/me starts Occupy Paug movement

I'm gonna sit the fuck down in this thread and I'm not leaving for any reason any time soon unless our demands are met. I will stay here through rain sleet, snow, postal strikes, and..

oh shit time to flip the record.

bbialb

The people show up, and suddenly the job poll creators are nowhere to be found.

No Bozeman, no peace.  No Bozeman, no peace.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: rowjimmy on August 10, 2012, 09:18:01 AM
Quote from: mirthbeatenworker on August 09, 2012, 11:45:42 PM
No Bozeman, no peace.  No Bozeman, no peace.


/me urinates in a corner of the thread
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: runawayjimbo on August 10, 2012, 09:36:56 AM
Quote from: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 10:54:12 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 10:45:34 PM
Quote from: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 06:52:42 PM
/me starts Occupy Paug movement

I'm gonna sit the fuck down in this thread and I'm not leaving for any reason any time soon unless our demands are met. I will stay here through rain sleet, snow, postal strikes, and..

oh shit time to flip the record.

bbialb

The people show up, and suddenly the job poll creators are nowhere to be found.

/me sneaks out the back door with the big bags of money from MSG Mike's
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: rowjimmy on August 10, 2012, 09:47:46 AM
"MSG Mike's" sounds like a Deli.
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: gah on August 10, 2012, 11:23:08 AM
Quote from: runawayjimbo on August 10, 2012, 09:36:56 AM
Quote from: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 10:54:12 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 09, 2012, 10:45:34 PM
Quote from: kellerb on August 09, 2012, 06:52:42 PM
/me starts Occupy Paug movement

I'm gonna sit the fuck down in this thread and I'm not leaving for any reason any time soon unless our demands are met. I will stay here through rain sleet, snow, postal strikes, and..

oh shit time to flip the record.

bbialb

The people show up, and suddenly the job poll creators are nowhere to be found.

/me sneaks out the back door with the big bags of money from MSG Mike's

*gah hits on the half naked hippie chick....doh! it's just phil cross dressing again...nevermind
Title: Re: If it's a tie, should the next round be a three-way fight?
Post by: mistercharlie on August 10, 2012, 04:26:11 PM
Quote from: rowjimmy on August 10, 2012, 09:47:46 AM
"MSG Mike's" sounds like a Deli.
Or a fried chicken joint.