The Trump White House: Adventures in Communications

[mbw]

Who gives a shit what kind of shoes she wears?  Serious question.

Also, I seem to remember people saying mean/racist/sexist things and creating photoshopped memes about the former first lady and people being outraged about it. 

Not going to search here, but, hypocrisy is SUCH a beautiful thing isn't it?

Go fucking cry somewhere else.

[runawayjimbo]

Who gives a shit what kind of shoes she wears?  Serious question.

Also, I seem to remember people saying mean/racist/sexist things and creating photoshopped memes about the former first lady and people being outraged about it. 

Not going to search here, but, hypocrisy is SUCH a beautiful thing isn't it?

Go fucking cry somewhere else.

Sound reasoning there

[mbw]

Who gives a shit what kind of shoes she wears?  Serious question.

Also, I seem to remember people saying mean/racist/sexist things and creating photoshopped memes about the former first lady and people being outraged about it. 

Not going to search here, but, hypocrisy is SUCH a beautiful thing isn't it?

Go fucking cry somewhere else.

Sound reasoning there

+



+



=



Hows that reasoning?
Might not be nice, but it's true.

[PIE-GUY]

When the president cares more about imagery (crowd size, beautiful women, gold decor, etc.) than he does literally anything else, then I feel it is fair to attack the imagery. Comparing that to the racist attacks on Michelle is truly a false equivalence.

[natronzero]

Goddamn right. Well said.

[Buffalo Budd]

Goddamn right. Well said.

Although I don't see the point in attacking the first lady in either sitch.
Pretty sure this isn't the life she would have chose.

[mehead]

Goddamn right. Well said.

Although I don't see the point in attacking the first lady in either sitch.
Pretty sure this isn't the life she would have chose.

I would normally agree but in this specific case, a FLOTUS hat. Really? A freaking FLOTUS hat?

[kellerb]

Goddamn right. Well said.

Although I don't see the point in attacking the first lady in either sitch.
Pretty sure this isn't the life she would have chose.

I would normally agree but in this specific case, a FLOTUS hat. Really? A freaking FLOTUS hat?

We all FLOTUS down here 

[GBL]

Goddamn right. Well said.

Although I don't see the point in attacking the first lady in either sitch.

Exactly

Goddamn right. Well said.

Although I don't see the point in attacking the first lady in either sitch.
Pretty sure this isn't the life she would have chose.

I would normally agree but in this specific case, a FLOTUS hat. Really? A freaking FLOTUS hat?

I get it, and in no way, shape or form am I agreeing with anything related to DT or his "policies".

However, slut shaming any women is lame as fuck, and coming from someone who I like and respect and who I view as a progressive thinker, like myself, is hypocritical, and well, lame as fuck.

[GBL]

When the president cares more about imagery (crowd size, beautiful women, gold decor, etc.) than he does literally anything else, then I feel it is fair to attack the imagery. Comparing that to the racist attacks on Michelle is truly a false equivalence.

No false equivalency here. 

So DT sucks (WHICH IS BEYOND OBVIOUS AND AN UNDERSTATEMENT), then its ok to slut shame his wife?  I don't think so.

[GBL]

Also, I love you guys and I feel completely comfortable fucking crying right here thank you very much.

[aphineday]

I mean, I would usually agree that the wives and children are out of bounds, and with Baron, I still feel that way. That said, when the now First Lady STEALS a speech from Michelle Obama, and then becomes an equal participant in this bullshit with her husband, I have a hard time leaving her out of it.

[GBL]

I get that, but again, I think you're missing the point.

[runawayjimbo]

When the president cares more about imagery (crowd size, beautiful women, gold decor, etc.) than he does literally anything else, then I feel it is fair to attack the imagery. Comparing that to the racist attacks on Michelle is truly a false equivalence.

And he is rightly ridiculed for that obsession. But I still don't get how that justifies similar superficial behavior to attack him.

Member that whole "when they go low, we go high" thing? I member.

[mbw]

Fuck Baron too.