health != life
you keep quoting the same thing. the point made by the Supreme Court was that a woman's health (= organ damage, infertility, etc) should not matter, only whether or not she will live. if she will live, the procedure is illegal, irrelevant of any health issues she may have from it. if she will die, the procedure is legal, as per a provision in the law. the entire point of the case was the lack of a health exception, not a life exception.