Birther talk

[twatts]

the Constitution doesn't discriminate against foreign conception.

Which could be held as a Constitutional declaration that life begins at birth!

Not sure, I suppose...  But per this topic, the issue is whether or not OB was "natural born" within the US (and its jurisdictions).  Its an interesting argument, with great reach (think roe v. wade or fetus protection laws).

Terry

[rowjimmy]

the Constitution doesn't discriminate against foreign conception.

Which could be held as a Constitutional declaration that life begins at birth!

Not sure, I suppose...  But per this topic, the issue is whether or not OB was "natural born" within the US (and its jurisdictions).  Its an interesting argument, with great reach (think roe v. wade or fetus protection laws).

Terry

That's what I was pointing toward... thanks for spelling it out for the slow.

[twatts]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

After the Chinese and Muslims take over, they will use the "circumcision" test to identify "Americans" and other westerners...  Those "marked" will be sent to "re-education" camps... 

Terry

[twatts]

the Constitution doesn't discriminate against foreign conception.

Which could be held as a Constitutional declaration that life begins at birth!

Not sure, I suppose...  But per this topic, the issue is whether or not OB was "natural born" within the US (and its jurisdictions).  Its an interesting argument, with great reach (think roe v. wade or fetus protection laws).

Terry

That's what I was pointing toward... thanks for spelling it out for the slow.

How long did it take you to find a way to point out I'm slow without being offensive???    :-P :-D

[sls.stormyrider]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

After the Chinese and Muslims take over, they will use the "circumcision" test to identify "Americans" and other westerners...  Those "marked" will be sent to "re-education" camps... 

Terry

will we get our foreskin back?

[rowjimmy]

I came up with my response right away.
But it wasn't YOU that I was suggesting might be slow.

the Constitution doesn't discriminate against foreign conception.

Which could be held as a Constitutional declaration that life begins at birth!

Not sure, I suppose...  But per this topic, the issue is whether or not OB was "natural born" within the US (and its jurisdictions).  Its an interesting argument, with great reach (think roe v. wade or fetus protection laws).

Terry

That's what I was pointing toward... thanks for spelling it out for the slow.

How long did it take you to find a way to point out I'm slow without being offensive???    :-P :-D

[Hicks]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

After the Chinese and Muslims take over, they will use the "circumcision" test to identify "Americans" and other westerners...  Those "marked" will be sent to "re-education" camps... 

Terry

Muslims are down with choppage.

[Poster Nutbag]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

I'm not sure what you mean. There are other Americans who don't/won't get circumcised.

I was just making an argument against San Francsico's "Cicumcision Law", pointing out that San Francsico's circumcision law is going to possibly victimize any children who are born after the law is passed by possibly excluding them from having the proper paper work to run for President of the United States.   


But I see where you are coming from,you are making the argument against Arizona's "Birther Law", by saying that there are already men that haven't been circumcised and there will be men in the future that won't be circumcised, not to mention the exclusion of all women.

The birther law states that if you do not possess an official birth certificate, than you may use your circumcision papers as proof.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/14/arizona-birther-law-to-accept-circumcision-papers-as-proof-of-citizenship/


::by the way, on a side note:: all this has me laughing in absolute hysterics...      

[kellerb]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

I'm not sure what you mean. There are other Americans who don't/won't get circumcised.

I was just making an argument against San Francsico's "Cicumcision Law", pointing out that San Francsico's circumcision law is going to possibly victimize any children who are born after the law is passed by possibly excluding them from having the proper paper work to run for President of the United States.   


But I see where you are coming from,you are making the argument against Arizona's "Birther Law", by saying that there are already men that haven't been circumcised and there will be men in the future that won't be circumcised, not to mention the exclusion of all women.

The birther law states that if you do not possess an official birth certificate, than you may use your circumcision papers as proof.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/14/arizona-birther-law-to-accept-circumcision-papers-as-proof-of-citizenship/


::by the way, on a side note:: all this has me laughing in absolute hysterics...    

so you're saying if obama had a video of a rabbi sucking blood off his infant cock, donald trump wouldn't have pretended to run for president?

[rowjimmy]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

I'm not sure what you mean. There are other Americans who don't/won't get circumcised.

I was just making an argument against San Francsico's "Cicumcision Law", pointing out that San Francsico's circumcision law is going to possibly victimize any children who are born after the law is passed by possibly excluding them from having the proper paper work to run for President of the United States.   


But I see where you are coming from,you are making the argument against Arizona's "Birther Law", by saying that there are already men that haven't been circumcised and there will be men in the future that won't be circumcised, not to mention the exclusion of all women.

The birther law states that if you do not possess an official birth certificate, than you may use your circumcision papers as proof.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/14/arizona-birther-law-to-accept-circumcision-papers-as-proof-of-citizenship/


::by the way, on a side note:: all this has me laughing in absolute hysterics...    

Actually, all I was saying is that some people choose not to circumcise their children.

[fauxpaxfauxreal]

You guys know that some people don't like to eat meat, right?

[sls.stormyrider]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

I'm not sure what you mean. There are other Americans who don't/won't get circumcised.

I was just making an argument against San Francsico's "Cicumcision Law", pointing out that San Francsico's circumcision law is going to possibly victimize any children who are born after the law is passed by possibly excluding them from having the proper paper work to run for President of the United States.   


But I see where you are coming from,you are making the argument against Arizona's "Birther Law", by saying that there are already men that haven't been circumcised and there will be men in the future that won't be circumcised, not to mention the exclusion of all women.

The birther law states that if you do not possess an official birth certificate, than you may use your circumcision papers as proof.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/14/arizona-birther-law-to-accept-circumcision-papers-as-proof-of-citizenship/


::by the way, on a side note:: all this has me laughing in absolute hysterics...    

Actually, all I was saying is that some people choose not to circumcise their children.

if those people want their kid to be president,they better not move to Arizona

[rowjimmy]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

I'm not sure what you mean. There are other Americans who don't/won't get circumcised.

I was just making an argument against San Francsico's "Cicumcision Law", pointing out that San Francsico's circumcision law is going to possibly victimize any children who are born after the law is passed by possibly excluding them from having the proper paper work to run for President of the United States.   


But I see where you are coming from,you are making the argument against Arizona's "Birther Law", by saying that there are already men that haven't been circumcised and there will be men in the future that won't be circumcised, not to mention the exclusion of all women.

The birther law states that if you do not possess an official birth certificate, than you may use your circumcision papers as proof.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/14/arizona-birther-law-to-accept-circumcision-papers-as-proof-of-citizenship/


::by the way, on a side note:: all this has me laughing in absolute hysterics...    

Actually, all I was saying is that some people choose not to circumcise their children.

if those people want their kid to be president,they better not move to Arizona

Arizona gets crossed off the list long before I consider that factor.

[kellerb]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

I'm not sure what you mean. There are other Americans who don't/won't get circumcised.

I was just making an argument against San Francsico's "Cicumcision Law", pointing out that San Francsico's circumcision law is going to possibly victimize any children who are born after the law is passed by possibly excluding them from having the proper paper work to run for President of the United States.   


But I see where you are coming from,you are making the argument against Arizona's "Birther Law", by saying that there are already men that haven't been circumcised and there will be men in the future that won't be circumcised, not to mention the exclusion of all women.

The birther law states that if you do not possess an official birth certificate, than you may use your circumcision papers as proof.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/14/arizona-birther-law-to-accept-circumcision-papers-as-proof-of-citizenship/


::by the way, on a side note:: all this has me laughing in absolute hysterics...    

Actually, all I was saying is that some people choose not to circumcise their children.

if those people want their kid to be president,they better not move to Arizona

Arizona gets crossed off the list long before I consider that factor.

But, its a dry heat

[rowjimmy]

If they ban circumcision in San Francisco, then how will they know who is allowed to run for president in the long future ahead... This is a worthy argument we as people should make for our future generations of children...

I'm not sure what you mean. There are other Americans who don't/won't get circumcised.

I was just making an argument against San Francsico's "Cicumcision Law", pointing out that San Francsico's circumcision law is going to possibly victimize any children who are born after the law is passed by possibly excluding them from having the proper paper work to run for President of the United States.   


But I see where you are coming from,you are making the argument against Arizona's "Birther Law", by saying that there are already men that haven't been circumcised and there will be men in the future that won't be circumcised, not to mention the exclusion of all women.

The birther law states that if you do not possess an official birth certificate, than you may use your circumcision papers as proof.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/14/arizona-birther-law-to-accept-circumcision-papers-as-proof-of-citizenship/


::by the way, on a side note:: all this has me laughing in absolute hysterics...    

Actually, all I was saying is that some people choose not to circumcise their children.

if those people want their kid to be president,they better not move to Arizona

Arizona gets crossed off the list long before I consider that factor.

But, its a dry heat

You know what else is a dry heat?
My radiators.