Political Vids/Images

[gah]

Norfolk in da house!  :hereitisyousentimentalbastard

What's your credit score?

Dude gets it.

Yup.  As does most of America at this point.

[UncleEbinezer]

Norfolk in da house!  :hereitisyousentimentalbastard

What's your credit score?

Dude gets it.

Yup.  As does most of America at this point.

:hereitisyousentimentalbastard

I always enjoy a refreshing no bullshit way of saying it. 

[gah]

don't know if it'll show up, but you can follow the link if it doesn't...funny stuff

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1856298

[sls.stormyrider]

 

[runawayjimbo]

Ron Paul wins the flowchart argument.

[PIE-GUY]

[VDB]

Class warfare!

[gah]

Class warfare!

Agreed. I don't subscribe to this sort of nonsense.  ME ME ME!

[runawayjimbo]

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

[gah]

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

just to clarify, you mean federal income tax when you throw that # around, right?

[Hicks]

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

And why is that?  Could it be that 47% of US households don't make dick?

Perhaps that's the real problem.

[gah]

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

And why is that?  Could it be that 47% of US households don't make dick?

Perhaps that's the real problem.

Wrong again Hicks, they have refrigerators. And tv's. Possibly even phones. Hell, they might even be working two jobs! Like one wasn't enough! Assholes. They need to trade that shit in at the pawn shop and pay the fuck up! I'm sick of these lazy bastards not paying their fair share.

[Hicks]

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

And why is that?  Could it be that 47% of US households don't make dick?

Perhaps that's the real problem.

Wrong again Hicks, they have refrigerators. And tv's. Possibly even phones. Hell, they might even be working two jobs! Like one wasn't enough! Assholes. They need to trade that shit in at the pawn shop and pay the fuck up! I'm sick of these lazy bastards not paying their fair share.

Not to mention they knew exactly how little those jobs paid when they took them, they have only themselves to blame.

[runawayjimbo]

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

just to clarify, you mean federal income tax when you throw that # around, right?

Duly noted

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

And why is that?  Could it be that 47% of US households don't make dick?

Perhaps that's the real problem.

Fair, but a woman in the highest of brackets saying "the rest of us" doesn't strike you as the least bit hypocritical?

[Hicks]

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

just to clarify, you mean federal income tax when you throw that # around, right?

Duly noted

When she says "the rest of us", does she mean the people in the country who make $350,000 for teaching one class 2 days a week at Haaaaaarvard? Because she can't possibly mean the 47% of people who paid no income tax in 2009, right?

And why is that?  Could it be that 47% of US households don't make dick?

Perhaps that's the real problem.

Fair, but a woman in the highest of brackets saying "the rest of us" doesn't strike you as the least bit hypocritical?

If said woman is acting as an advocate for "us" working stiffs out in the trenches, then no, not in the slightest.