Quote from: mattstick on November 29, 2010, 02:05:40 PM
One of the things I like about the musical costume is hearing Phish interpret an album recorded in the studio.  This was obviously not a factor with Waiting For Columbus.

I get what you are saying but it kind of ends up being moot because the Stones and The Who (and actually Pink Floyd after DSOTM became an actual album) all basically are playing exact copies of the studio versions of their songs when they perform.

That said, out of ignorance I don't know how WFC (as performed by LF) compares to Little Feat songs from the studio.

Basically, I just am curious if Little Feat falls into my Stones, Who, semi-Pink Floyd category.

It's not really a moot point because they didn't learn the live versions.  They listened to the albums and learned that.  Further to that point, some of those Exile songs had never been performed live by The Rolling Stones.

The Waiting For Columbus arrangements are, for the most part, different from the studio versions.

Quote from: mattstick on November 29, 2010, 02:20:30 PM

It's not really a moot point because they didn't learn the live versions.  They listened to the albums and learned that.  Further to that point, some of those Exile songs had never been performed live by The Rolling Stones.

The Waiting For Columbus arrangements are, for the most part, different from the studio versions.

Fair enough on the WFC comparison I just haven't listened to them enough,

but as far as Exile/Stones are concerned, it wasn't as much the album I was talking about as I was the way they perform live in general. What you hear the Stones play live is what you hear on the album, so had Phish learned a live Stones show, it would have still been about the same as learning the studio cuts. The only difference is the absurd stage and volume level  :-P

Again I see what you mean, but most of those bands just don't stray too far from the studio if at all.

I respectfully disagree, as Exile was recorded over many months and recording sessions and features a lot of 3-guitar attack sections which Trey really nailed in his arrangements.

Also, Quadrophenia sounds nothing like what The Who sound like live.

Seemed to me that a few tracks from Exile were fairly different than the Stones versions.

Quote from: Hicks on November 29, 2010, 02:45:29 PM
Seemed to me that a few tracks from Exile were fairly different than the Stones versions.

See just want to see his face.

Best stash of 3.0?

:smoke:

Quote from: McGrupp on November 29, 2010, 11:04:10 PM
Best stash of 3.0?

:smoke:

Yeah, LOVE this stash, it gets out theree. Shit is epic! Def gets slipped under the radar compared to the rest of the show. The layers the band creates when starting off the jam is sure great  :rockout:

Quote from: redrum on November 29, 2010, 01:22:07 PM
what are you a fan of thatfar? besides hating on tours you're on?

Replying to stupid questions. :-P

Insightful 

Quote from: McGrupp on November 29, 2010, 11:04:10 PM
Best stash of 3.0?

:smoke:

Quote from: emayPhishyMD on November 30, 2010, 11:07:55 AM

Quote from: McGrupp on November 29, 2010, 11:04:10 PM
Best stash of 3.0?

:smoke:

Yeah, LOVE this stash, it gets out theree. Shit is epic! Def gets slipped under the radar compared to the rest of the show. The layers the band creates when starting off the jam is sure great  :rockout:

I just had the ipod on shuffle and this stash popped up.  As soon as the jam started my ears perked up, and it drew me in.  This is maybe the most uplifting Stash I've heard, as opposed to the darker evil territory most of them usually cover.  Nice jam, esp. Trey and Mike interplay.  I'll come back to this for sure,  fwiw....